← all vendors

Fishbowl

AI score: 55 / 100 Proceed with caution

Inventory and warehouse management plugin for QuickBooks

Type: plug-ins / best-of-breed  ·  Tech: legacy  ·  Budget: incidental ($0–$10k/yr)
Core verticals: food & beverage, distribution / wholesale, retail
Functions: inventory / WMS

The most widely used QuickBooks manufacturing and inventory add-on. Best first step for product-based businesses before committing to full ERP. Strong in warehousing, barcoding, and order management.

editor's note: Inventory management plug-in (compare to Cin7)

Most widely installed QuickBooks inventory add-on — but implementation disasters, support failures, and QuickBooks integration bugs that 'leave warehouses inoperable for days' are documented across every review platform. Industry reputation matches Jordan's assessment: notoriously difficult.

visit Fishbowl website  ↗

AI score breakdown — 6 dimensions

SMB implementability 25%52
On-prem heritage (Fishbowl Desktop) plus newer Fishbowl Drive cloud. Installation and setup are complex for an add-on. Community reports paying $20–30K+ for software with basic functionality issues. Server resets required for end-of-day QuickBooks sync.
Purpose fit 20%62
Basic inventory management, warehousing, and barcoding for product businesses. Not purpose-built for distribution specifically — a generic inventory layer. Adequate breadth for simple product-based businesses.
Tech modernity 20%42
Legacy Windows-based Desktop product remains dominant despite Drive cloud offering. Aged inventory date reset bug (aged inventory resets to zero on location move) is a basic data model problem. Architecture is fundamentally legacy.
Documentation quality 15%55
Some public documentation available. Knowledge base exists. QuickBooks integration guides published — though integration behavior documented by users diverges from vendor claims.
Real user sentiment 10%28
Reviews describe support as 'possibly the worst part of the software.' Multiple accounts of warehouses being inoperable for days due to support failures. Consistent pattern of sales promises that don't match delivered functionality.
TCO transparency 10%38
No prominently published pricing. Community reports $20–30K+ spend for implementations with basic functionality problems. Surprise costs are a recurring review theme.

Sources consulted

validate / explore this score: Perplexity ChatGPT Claude Google

Similar tools